Robert Seiden as Receiver over Trustify Inc. helped bring case to justice as former CEO was indicted by Department of Justice and arrested by the FBI.

Robert Seiden as Receiver appointed by the Delaware Chancery Court in the matter of Trustify Inc. helped bring case to justice. Danny Boyce, the former CEO of Trustify was indicted for mail and securities fraud by the US Department of Justice and arrested by the FBI on July 24, 2020. Seiden Law Group gathered evidence and investigated Boyce and Trustify since the receivership commenced on April 18, 2019.

According to the Department of Justice, "Daniel Boice, 41, of Alexandria, Virginia, was charged with five counts of wire fraud, one count of securities fraud, and two counts of money laundering.

The indictment alleges that, beginning in 2015, Boice fraudulently solicited investments in Trustify, a privately-held technology start-up company that connected customers with private investigators.  Boice allegedly raised approximately $18.5 million from over 90 investors by, among other things, falsely overstating Trustify’s financial performance.  The indictment also alleges that Boice made false statements to investors about the amount of investor funds that he would personally receive, while diverting a substantial amount of the investor money to his own benefit."

Seiden Law Group team helps bring global fraudster to justice in a massive half billion dollar scam that spans Europe, Hong Kong and New York.

Seiden Law Group represents the Libra Group Inc., a U.S.-based conglomerate conducting international business in over 35 countries, worldwide. Seiden Law Group has been leading the Libra Group's efforts in seeking justice against a former employee that swindled half a billion dollars from the company. The massive scam has spanned Europe, Hong Kong and New York, being brought in multiple courts around the world. The case has been reported on by Business Insurance in the U.S. and Greek Reporter in Greece.


Seiden Law Group obtains precedent-setting decision allowing alternative service amidst the COVID-19 pandemic

Convergen Energy LLC et al v. Brooks et al

United States District Court, Southern District of New York

2020 WL 4038353

Case No. 1:20-cv-3746-LJL

On July 17, 2020, the Honorable Judge Lewis J. Liman ruled in favor of Seiden Law Group clients, Libra Group and Convergen Energy LLC, granting Plaintiffs' motion for alternative service on the international defendants named in the case. 

The Hon. Judge Liman considered the exigent circumstances provided by the current global pandemic and recognized the plaintiff's efforts to effect service via the proper international channels and the significant delay in procedure that would result. After reviewing these facts, the Court ruled to "exercise its discretion to order service pursuant to Rule 4(f)(3)" and granted the Plaintiffs' motion for alternative service on the international defendants located in Spain.

Robert Seiden's asset recovery efforts highlighted in article published in Institutional Investor by Michael Rapoport.

Author Michael Rapaport writes article in Institutional Investor about Chinese Companies defrauding U.S. investors and how Seiden Law Group LLP's managing partner, Robert Seiden, has provided a way to recover investor funds by recovering company assets via the U.S. courts. 

Seiden Law Group defeats anticipatory filing in Wisconsin and transfers case to New York


Convergen Energy WI LLC v. L'Anse Warden Electric Company LLC

United States District Court, Western District of Wisconsin

2020 WL 3833075

Case No. 3:20-cv-00543-wmc

On July 20, 2020, the Honorable Judge William M. Conley ruled in favor of Seiden Law Group client, Libra Group and L'Anse Warden Electric Company LLC, ruling to transfer the case to the Southern District of New York.

The Order states:

"Here, despite plaintiff’s assertions to the contrary, this case is inextricably tied to the pending New York action. . .

Of course, the Eastern District of Wisconsin action was filed hours before the New York suit, albeit originally in state court. Like this case, however, the Eastern District lawsuit does not include the entire range of issues before it, and plaintiff has now intentionally carved out any issue related to enforceability of the Supply Agreement. Moreover, in merely seeking a declaratory judgment as to the enforceability of the other acquisition documents, plaintiffs in that suit essentially acknowledge that they are not “the natural plaintiffs.” See Allendale Mut. Ins. Co. v. Bull Data Sys., Inc., 10 F.3d 425, 431 (7th Cir. 1993) (“[A] suit for declaratory judgment aimed solely at wresting the choice of forum from the ‘natural’ plaintiff will normally be dismissed and the case allowed to proceed in the usual way.”)."


Seiden Law Group, LLP led the successful effort from the start to remove General Israel Ziv from the U.S. Treasury OFAC Sanctions List.

Working with a team hand selected by Seiden Law Group, we successfully achieved the removal of sanctions against General Israel Ziv, an Israeli war hero (and his companies). General Ziv worked for years building farms in South Sudan to feed a malnourished population. His removal in less than one year was a remarkable achievement and we thank the members of the legal team and the United States government for their efforts.

Details here: OFAC REMOVAL 

Media coverage:

We are thankful to General Ziv for his trust in us and appreciate his gracious letter below:

Seiden Law Group, LLP sued a global wine fraudster in New York State court for bilking over a dozen investors.

Kresimir Penavic et al. v. Omar Khan et al.

New York State Supreme Court, Case No. 0655058/2019

Seiden Law Group was selected by a large group of successful Americans to investigate and bring charges against a global wine industry player who, evidence showed, orchestarted a massive scheme to defraud them of millions of dollars. Seiden Law Group brought the evidence forward and was able to bring charges in the New York State Supreme Court against the main target and his co-conspirators. The complaint alleges fraud, misrepresentation, unjust enrichment and multiple other counts.

The case received wide international publicity, including:

Seiden Law Group LLP secured a $240 million judgment against valve manufacturer.

Markbreiter v. China Valves Technology, Inc.

Supreme Court of Nevada, Eighth Judicial District Court

Case No. A-16-746645-B

China Valves Technology (“CVVT”) is a leading developer, manufacturer and provider of flow management products and services throughout China. As the 2nd largest valve company in China with a billion plus market capital, CVVT supplies valves, actuators, forging and castings, valve locks etc. According to their website and through source inquiries, they appear to have employed ~2,4000 people in China and have more than 50 distributors in over 30 countries.

After listing on the US markets and rasing capital from US investors, the company went dark. Robert Seiden was then appointed as receiver for CVVT to enforce a judgement of about $240 million against CVVT by way of a share buyback order.

Subsequently, the Chairman Siping Fang, illegally transferred out the subsidiaries, which blocked the receiver from exercising control over them. The court granted the receiver’s request for a civil contempt against Fang which was followed by an order of criminal contempt.

See the following for more detail:

Seiden Law Group, LLP enters a ten year legal battle at the eleventh hour to try a case in Manhattan State Supreme Court and wins a $90m award after a 3 week jury trial.

Gentry T. Beach et al. v. Touradji Capital Management, LP, et al.

New York Supreme Court, Case No. 603611/2008

Seiden Law Group entered the case a few months befopre jury selection was scheduled and represented the plaintiffs, Gentry Beach and Robert Vollero, in their fight against their former employer who refused to pay them bonuses earaned based on their performance. The award exceeded all expectations when the jury returned a $46M verdict (with statutory interest the award totaled over $90M).

The victory was widely publicized, including on the front cover of the widely respected New York Law Journal, as well as articles published in theNew York Post, and the Wall Street Journal.

Seiden Law Group, LLP represented large insurance company against Lincoln International in U.S. Federal District Court for massive losses related to the Platinum and Beechwood hedge fund ponzi scheme.

Senior Health Insurance Company of Pennsylvania v. Lincoln International LLC and Lincoln Partners Advisors LLC

United States District Court, Southern District of New York

In re Platinum-Beechwood Litigation

Case No. 18-cv-6658 and Case No. 19-cv-7137

Seiden Law Group was hired by a large Pennsylvania health insurance provider called known as “SHIP” after they were the victim of a masssive loss due to the wrongdoing of several investment vehicles.  Seiden Law Group filed a massive claim against Lincoln International who were supposed to be the valuation firm protecting SHIP. The case was filed against Lincoln International in U.S. Federal District Court in Manhattan seeking  massive losses related to the Platinum and Beechwood hedge fund Ponzi scheme. Seiden Law Group overcame the motion to dismiss brought by Lincoln and their lawyers Skadden Arps.

Successful recovery of funds on behalf of investors in a China-based pharmaceutical company.

Pope Investments, LLC v. Shengtai Pharmaceutical, Inc.

Delaware Chancery Court, Case No. 9122-ML

On April 3, 2014, Robert Seiden was appointed Receiver over a Shengtai Pharmaceutical, Inc., a US publicly-listed company with Hong Kong and China operations.  Seiden was able to structure a deal with the company chairman that bought out shares of US investors at $1.65/share even though it was trading at $.12/share. The settlement was approved by the court and all parties and shareholders received the money totaling approximately $4m.

This case has been widely covered in the media by reputable sources such as the Wall Street Journal and the New York Times.

Cayman Islands court appoints Seiden Law Group as first ever receiver over a Cayman Islands company.

Robert Seiden, Managing Partner of Seiden Law Group, was appointed as Receiver over Link Motion, Inc. pursuant to an order dated February 4, 2020 by the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands. Link Motion, Inc. is a Cayman Islands company with operations in China. This was the first-ever U.S. Receiver to be appointed over a Cayman Islands company. The order from the Cayman Court in the matter of Link Motion, Inc. has enormous significance to international businesses that use offshore vehicles to shield from liability and legal exposure.

Armed with this court order, the Receiver, Robert Seiden, a former prosecutor in Manhattan and the Receiver over 30 public companies, and his team of lawyers, investigators and professionals in the United States, Hong Kong and China are in the process of securing the company from plunder by the company chairman and his cronies, as alleged in the court papers.

See the court ruling here: Robert Seiden vLink Motion Inc.: Ruling

Seiden Law Group, LLP has been engaged to represent the Syrian Democratic Council (SDC), a Northern Eastern Syria group of mostly Kurdish Syrians aligned with the United States.

Successfully sold China/US biotechnology company for the benefit of US shareholders on China Equity Exchange (a first for a Western seller).

Secured injunction against publicly listed company to prevent illegal transfer of assets.

Baliga v. Link Motion, Inc.

United States District Court, Southern District of New York

Case No. 1:18-cv-11642

In February 2019, Robert Seiden was appointed by the Honorable Victor Marrero of the U.S. District Court Southern District of New York as the temporary Receiver over Link Motion Inc. (“LKM”) and granted a preliminary injunction restraining Link Motion from transferring any assets out of the Company without the Receiver's approval.

The lawsuit underlying the Receivership stems from a series of alleged misconduct by Link Motion's Chairman, Dr. Vincent Shi. The lawsuit was brought by an LKM shareholder, after information of the alleged wrongdoing was brought to light by former U.S. employee Matt Mathison.  LKMForward, a significant group of shareholders, hired Seiden Law Group (formerly The Seiden Group) as its counsel to represent its case and to assist all shareholders in the ultimate recovery of Company assets. 

For more information, see here.

Successful recovery of funds on behalf of shareholders/investors in a China-based technology company.

Southpaw Credit Opportunity Master Fund LP v. Advanced Battery Technologies, Inc.

Delaware Chancery Court, Case No. 9542-ML

Robert Seiden of Seiden Law Group, was appointed Receiver over Advanced Battery Technologies, Inc. (“ABAT”) by the Delaware Chancery Court on July 23, 2015. ABAT was delisted from the NASDAQ in 2012 after evidence surfaced of misstated financials and the chairman stopped filing with the SEC leaving the shareholders in the dark. Through his actions as Court-Appointed Receiver, Seiden, along with his global law firm, Seiden Law Group, and a forensic asset recovery investigations company, Confidential Global Investigations, worked with his team of global agents in China, Hong Kong and the US to hold the chairman accountable, despite the fact that the company was taken over by the Chinese government and Chinese banks due to overwhelming debt. The settlement, which included a cash payment of $2 million, was approved by the Delaware Chancery court in 2017.

See here for more information on ABAT.

Seiden Law Group's Robert Seiden was the first US Receiver to gain control of a mainland China company.

For the first time in China-US capital market history, the Receiver of Link Motion Inc (Ticker: LKM) has successfully pierced a Variable Interest Entity (VIE) company’s shareholding after prevailing in a China arbitration before the largest China arbitration panel (China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission). Robert Seiden, as the United States court-appointed Receiver and his Seiden Law Group legal team successfully overcame the legal contradictions arising out of VIE structures, and managed to achieve success in obtaining legal control over a PRC operating entity. The Receiver was appointed a little over a year ago by federal Judge Victor Marrero of the Southern District of New York . This victory sets an important precedent for US shareholders who have taken risks by investing in China companies, including Alibaba, Tencent and Baidu, which are all VIE structured Chinese business listed on the NASDAQ. In total, almost $1.3 trillion in market capitalization is linked to Chinese VIE’s listed outside the Chinese mainland, according to U.S. credit-ratings provider Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC.